In July 2011, Nassar Group, a well-diversified conglomerate operating in Dubai, bought the rights to manage Max'sBurger's network of franchised outlets in Dubai. Max's Burger is an emerging American fast-food chain with franchised outlets across the globe. Nassar group bought the franchise rights of Max’s Burger outlet in Dubai. There were many fast-food outlet of franchised restaurants in Dubai, among them Max’s Burger’s meat quality was lower standard. As Nassar group didn’t want to jeopardize their reputation. The ordered the warehouse manager to decline any frozen food shipment that doesn’t meet the franchise standard. When the shipment came, the frozen meat temperature was little bit off which would not risk customer’s health but would affect the food taste. Though the manager didn’t considered the little mis-match of the temperature before, now he is having second thoughts. 1. Does the decision to accept or refiuse the frozen meat the company supplying the meat to Max's Burger is owned by a relative of the warehouse manager e his reputation and image t, and for many years shipment call for ethical or legal consicderations Why?
2. Identify the stakeholders who will be influenced by the 2. With the new directive in place, however, the ware- house manager was unsure about his decision. Even though he knew that Nassar would have no way of finding out that the received meat was noncompliant, he wasn't as sure about his decision this time around.
3. What type of decision-making framework would you advise the warehouse manager to adopt in order to help him reach an optimal decision? How will your suggestion help?