The results for July for Brahms & Sons follow:
Actual (based on actual sales of 64,...
![Business](/tpl/images/cats/ekonomika.png)
Business, 30.05.2020 19:59, coursonianp8izbc
The results for July for Brahms & Sons follow:
Actual (based on actual sales of 64,800 units) Master Budget (based on budgeted sales of 54,000 units)
Sales revenues $ 479,500 $ 490,000
Less
Variable costs
Direct material 59,700 49,000
Direct labor 51,700 61,000
Variable overhead 60,200 61,000
Marketing 20,450 20,000
Administration 18,950 20,000
Total variable costs $ 211,000 $ 211,000
Contribution margin $ 268,500 $ 279,000
Less
Fixed costs
Manufacturing 99,500 97,200
Marketing 18,900 16,200
Administration 82,400 $ 81,000
Total fixed costs $ 200,800 $ 194,400
Operating profits $ 67,700 $ 84,600
Required:1. Prepare a profit variance analysis for Brahms & Sons. (Do not round intermediate calculations. Indicate the effect of each variance by selecting "F" for favorable, or "U" for unfavorable. If there is no effect, do not select either option.)
![answer](/tpl/images/cats/otvet.png)
Answers: 3
Other questions on the subject: Business
![image](/tpl/images/cats/ekonomika.png)
![image](/tpl/images/cats/ekonomika.png)
Business, 22.06.2019 08:40, kamarionnatillman13
The following selected circumstances relate to pending lawsuits for erismus, inc. erismus’s fiscal year ends on december 31. financial statements are issued in march 2019. erismus prepares its financial statements according to u. s. gaap. required: indicate the amount erismus would record as an asset, liability, or not accrued in the following circumstances. 1. erismus is defending against a lawsuit. erismus's management believes the company has a slightly worse than 50/50 chance of eventually prevailing in court, and that if it loses, the judgment will be $1,000,000. 2. erismus is defending against a lawsuit. erismus's management believes it is probable that the company will lose in court. if it loses, management believes that damages could fall anywhere in the range of $2,000,000 to $4,000,000, with any damage in that range equally likely. 3. erismus is defending against a lawsuit. erismus's management believes it is probable that the company will lose in court. if it loses, management believes that damages will eventually be $5,000,000, with a present value of $3,500,000. 4. erismus is a plaintiff in a lawsuit. erismus's management believes it is probable that the company eventually will prevail in court, and that if it prevails, the judgment will be $1,000,000. 5. erismus is a plaintiff in a lawsuit. erismus’s management believes it is virtually certain that the company eventually will prevail in court, and that if it prevails, the judgment will be $500,000.
Answers: 1
![image](/tpl/images/cats/ekonomika.png)
Business, 22.06.2019 11:30, kaylabethany
Mai and chuck have been divorced since 2012. they have three boys, ages 6, 8, and 10. all of the boys live with mai and she receives child support from chuck. mai and chuck both work and the boys need child care before and after school. te boys attend the fun house day care center and mai paid them $2,000 and chuck paid them $3,000. mai's agi is $18,000 and chuck's is $29,000. mai will claim two of the boys as dependents. she signed form 8332 which allows chuck to claim one of the boys. who can take the child and dependent care credit?
Answers: 3
![image](/tpl/images/cats/ekonomika.png)
Business, 22.06.2019 12:10, ghari112345
In year 1, the bennetts' 25-year-old daughter, jane, is a full-time student at an out-of-state university but she plans to return home after the school year ends. in previous years, jane has never worked and her parents have always been able to claim her as a dependent. in year 1, a kind neighbor offers to pay for all of jane's educational and living expenses. which of the following statements is most accurate regarding whether jane's parents would be allowed to claim an exemption for jane in year 1 assuming the neighbor pays for all of jane's support? a. no, jane must include her neighbor's gift as income and thus fails the gross income test for a qualifying relative. b.yes, because she is a full-time student and does not provide more than half of her own support, jane is considered her parent's qualifying child. c.no, jane is too old to be considered a qualifying child and fails the support test of a qualifying relative. d.yes, because she is a student, her absence is considered as "temporary." consequently she meets the residence test and is a considered a qualifying child of the bennetts.
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Questions in other subjects:
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/en.png)
English, 12.11.2019 13:31
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/mat.png)
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/fizika.png)
Physics, 12.11.2019 13:31
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/biologiya.png)
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/himiya.png)
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/biologiya.png)
Biology, 12.11.2019 13:31
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/himiya.png)
Chemistry, 12.11.2019 13:31
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/mat.png)
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/obshestvoznanie.png)
Social Studies, 12.11.2019 13:31
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/mat.png)
Mathematics, 12.11.2019 13:31