Business
Business, 23.05.2020 12:57, ella3714

Question 4 (20 marks)
(a) The Hong Kong government became an active market participant which bought about US$15 billion shares of companies trading on the Hang Seng Index in August 1998 in the face of the Asian economic crisis. Discuss the pros and cons of its actions. (10 marks)

(b) Discuss the major risks of buying Exchange Traded Funds (ETF). (5 marks)

(c) What are the major challenges in developing ETF products in Hong Kong?
(5 marks)

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 21.06.2019 15:00, queensquishy2004
Do you have to get teased in the police academy?
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 19:00, lonelynomad00
Adrawback of short-term contracting as an alternative to making a component in-house is thata. it is the most-integrated alternative to performing an activity so the principal company has no control over the agent. b. the supplying firm has no incentive to make any transaction-specific investments to increase performance or quality. c. it fails to allow a long planning period that individual market transactions provide. d. the buying firm cannot demand lower prices due to the lack of a competitive bidding process.
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 20:50, fathimasaynas2975
Lead time for one of your fastest-moving products is 20 days. demand during this period averages 90 units per day. a) what would be an appropriate reorder point? ) how does your answer change if demand during lead time doubles? ) how does your answer change if demand during lead time drops in half?
Answers: 1
image
Business, 23.06.2019 17:30, Geo777
Why is the cournot equilibrium an​ equilibrium? a. there are​ short-run barriers to exit in a cournot​ duopoly, so both firms cannot alter their output levels. b. given the other​ firm's level of​ production, both firms are maximizing profits and cannot improve their situation by unilaterally altering their level of output. c. both firms operate at zero profit under a cournot​ equilibrium, so they would face negative profits if they change output. d. both firms operate at minimum​ long-run average cost under a cournot​ equilibrium, so changes to output would reduce​ long-run profits. even if they​ can't collude, why​ don't firms set their outputs at the joint​ profit-maximizing levels​ (i. e., the levels they would have chosen had they​ colluded)? a. given that other firm produces at the collusive​ level, a firm could increase their own profits by increasing output above the collusive level. b. the midpoint of the collusion curve​ (i. e., the collusive​ outcome) lies below the reaction​ curves, so both firms have an incentive to increase output under the cournot duopoly. c. both a and b are correct d. both a and b are incorrect
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Question 4 (20 marks)
(a) The Hong Kong government became an active market participant which b...

Questions in other subjects: