The following transactions of Houston Pharmacies occurred during 2017 and 2018:

2017
Jan. 9 Purchased computer equipment at a cost of $ 9,000, signing a six-month, 7%
note payable for that amount.
29 Recorded the week's sales of $ 69,000, three-fourths on credit and one-fourth
for cash. Sales amounts are subject to a 6% state sales tax. Ignore cost of
goods sold.
Feb. 5 Sent the last week's sales tax to the state.
Jul. 9 Paid the six-month, 7% note, plus interest, at maturity.
Aug. 31 Purchased merchandise inventory for $ 3,000, signing a six-month, 11% note
payable. The company uses the perpetual inventory system.
Dec. 31 Accrued warranty expense, which is estimated at 3% of sales of $ 601,000.
31 Accrued interest on all outstanding notes payable.
2018
Feb. 28 Paid the six-month 11% note, plus interest, at maturity.

Journalize the transactions in Houston’s general journal. Explanations are not required.

Salvador county issued $25 million of 5% demand bonds for construction of a county maintenance building. the county has no take-out agreement related to the bonds. it estimates that 20% of the bonds would be demanded (called) by the buyers if interest rates increased at least 1%. at year-end rates on comparable debt were 7%. how should these demand bonds be reported in the government-wide financial statements at year-end? a) $25 million in the long-term liability section of the governmental activities column. b) $5 million in the current liability section of the governmental activities column and $20 million in the long-term liabilities section of the governmental activities column. c) $5 million in the governmental activities column and $20 million would be reported in the schedule of changes in long-term debt obligations. d) $25 million in the current liability section of the governmental activities column

In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?

Which statement best describes the two reactions? abcl, + h2 → 2hci2h + h = he + inreaction a involves a greater change, and reaction b involves a change in element identity. reaction b involves a greater change and a change in element identityreaction a involves a greater change and a change in element identity. reaction b involves a greater change, and reaction a involves a change in element identity.