An individual client asks a CPA to determine whether the client is solvent for federal tax purposes. The client has assets consisting of cash and marketable securities with a basis of $250,000 and a fair market value of $155,000. The client has liabilities of $175,000, which include $130,000 of nondischargeable liabilities under the Bankruptcy Code. Which of the following statements is correct?A) The client is insolvent since the client's liabilities exceed the fair market value of the client's assets by $20,000B) The CPA is unable to determine whether the client is solvent or insolvent because the CPA is not an accredited appraiserC) The client is solvent because the fair market value of the client's assets exceeds the client's nondischargeable debt by $25,000D) The client is solvent because the basis of the client's assets totals $250,000 and exceeds the client's liabilities by $75,000

Which financial component is a mandatory deduction from your gross pay? a. sales tax b. social security tax c. health insurance d. disaster relief fund (drf) e. voluntary deduction

Miller mfg. is analyzing a proposed project. the company expects to sell 8,000 units, plus or minus 2 percent. the expected variable cost per unit is $11 and the expected fixed costs are $287,000. the fixed and variable cost estimates are considered accurate within a plus or minus 5 percent range. the depreciation expense is $68,000. the tax rate is 32 percent. the sales price is estimated at $64 a unit, plus or minus 3 percent. what is the earnings before interest and taxes under the base case scenario?

Richardson hired j. c. flood company, a plumbing contractor, to correct a stoppage in the sewer line of her house. the plumbing company's 'snake' device, used to clear the line leading to the main sewer, became caught in the underground line. to release it, the company excavated a portion of the sewer line in richardson's backyard. in the process, the company discovered numerous leaks in a rusty, defective water pipe that ran parallel with the sewer line. to meet public regulations, the water pipe, of a type no longer approved for such service, had to be replaced either then or later, when the yard would have to be excavated again. the plumbing company proceeded to repair the water pipe. though richardson inspected the company's work daily and did not express any objection to the extra work involved in replacing the water pipe, she refused to pay any part of the total bill after the company completed the entire operation. j. c. flood company then sued richardson for the costs of labor and material it had furnished. (c) for what, if anything, should richardson be liable? explain."