Business
Business, 05.05.2020 16:48, potatochin21

Innis Investments manages funds for a number of companies and wealthy clients. The investment strategy is tailored to each client’s needs. For a new client, Innis has been authorized to invest up to $1.2 million in two investment funds: a stock fund and a money market fund. Each unit of the stock fund costs $50 and provides an annual rate of return of 10%; each unit of the money market fund costs $100 and provides an annual rate of return of 4%.
The client wants to minimize risk subject to the requirement that the annual income from the investment be at least $60,000. According to Innis’s risk measurement system, each unit invested in the stock fund has a risk index of 8, and each unit invested in the money market fund has a risk index of 3; the higher risk index associated with the stock fund simply indicates that it is the riskier investment. Innis’s client also specifies that at least $300,000 be invested in the money market fund.
Letting
S = units purchased in the stock fund
M = units purchased in the money market fund

leads to the following formulation:
Min 8S + 3M
s. t.
50S + 100M ≤ 1,200,000 Funds available
5S + 4M ≥ 60,000 Annual income
M ≥ 3,000 Units in money market
S, M ≥ 0

The sensitivity report is shown in the figure below.
Optimal Objective Value = 62000.00000

Variable Value Reduced Cost
S 4000.00000 0.00000
M 10000.00000 0.00000

Constraint Slack/Surplus Dual Value
1 0.00000 -0.05667
2 0.00000 2.16667
3 7000.00000 0.00000

Variable Objective
Coefficient Allowable
Increase Allowable
Decrease
S 8.00000 Infinite 4.25000
M 3.00000 3.40000 Infinite

Constraint RHS
Value Allowable
Increase Allowable
Decrease
1 1200000.00000 300000.00000 420000.00000
2 60000.00000 42000.00000 12000.00000
3 3000.00000 7000.00000 Infinite

Suppose the risk index for the stock fund (the value of Cs) increases from its current value of 8 to 12. How does the optimal solution change, if at all?

(Options are: change, no change or unkown)because (options are: the allowable increase is 3, the allowable increase is 4.25, the allowable increase is 30,000, the allowable increase is infinite).
Suppose the risk index for the money market fund (the value of Cm) increases from its current value of 3 to 3.5. How does the optimal solution change, if at all?

(options are: no change, change, or unknown) because (options are: the allowable increase is 3, the allowable increase is 4.25, the allowable increase is 30,000, the allowable increase is infinite).
Suppose the value of Cs increases to 12 and the value of Cm increases to 3.5. How does the optimal solution change, if at all?

(options are: no change, change, or unknown) because two variables are not changing, the linear program (options are: needs, does not need) to be run again. The new solution (options are, remained the same or has changed).

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 21.06.2019 17:10, LolaSalem
Diggity dank corporation uses an activity-based costing system with two activity cost pools. diggity dank uses direct labor hours as the measure of activity in the first activity cost pool and the number of orders in the second activity cost pool. the following information relates to these two activity cost pools for last year: what was diggity dank's under- or overapplied overhead for last year? a. $17,000 overapplied b. $20,000 underapplied c. $27,000 underapplied d. $73,000 overapplied
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 10:30, kingyogii
The rybczynski theorem describes: (a) how commodity price changes influence real factor rewards (b) how commodity price changes influence relative factor rewards. (c) how changes in factor endowments cause changes in commodity outputs. (d) how trade leads to factor price equalization.
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 19:30, hmae2304
Alaska king crab fishing in the 1960s and '70s was a dangerous but rich fishery. boats from as far away as california and japan braved the treacherous gulf of alaska crossing to reach the abundant king crab beds in cook inlet and bristol bay. suddenly, in the early 1980s, the fishery crashed due to over fishing. all crabbing in those areas ended. to this day, there is no crabbing in bristol bay or cook inlet. a. how would an economist explain the decline of the alaska king crab fishery
Answers: 3
image
Business, 22.06.2019 19:30, cyynntthhiiaa4
Fly-by products, inc. operates primarily in the united states and has several segments. for the following segment, determine whether it is a cost center, profit center, or investment center: international operations- acts as an independent segment responsible for all facets of the business outside of the united states. select one: a. cost center b. profit center c. investment center
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Innis Investments manages funds for a number of companies and wealthy clients. The investment strate...

Questions in other subjects: