Business, 05.05.2020 17:30, canddpotts
A door-to-door vendor of vacuum cleaners tells a potential customer that the vacuum cleaners "slurp up dirt faster than a sweat-sopped boy could down a cold drink". After purchasing one of the vacuum cleaners, the customer discovers that it does not clean the cat hair off his carpets. Does the customer have legal recourse against the vendor?
a. Yes, he can sue the vendor for active fraud.
b. No, because the vendor's sales puffery would not be considered fraud.
c. Yes, he can sue the vendor for undue influence.
d. No, because the vendor has made a unilateral mistake.
Answers: 1
Business, 22.06.2019 14:40, kianofou853
Nell and kirby are in the process of negotiating their divorce agreement. what should be the tax consequences to nell and kirby if the following, considered individually, became part of the agreement? a. in consideration for her one-half interest in their personal residence, kirby will transfer to nell stock with a value of $200,000 and $50,000 of cash. kirby's cost of the stock was $150,000, and the value of the personal residence is $500,000. they purchased the residence three years ago for $300,000.nell's basis for the stock is $ xkirby's basis in the house is $ xb. nell will receive $1,000 per month for 120 months. if she dies before receiving all 120 payments, the remaining payments will be made to her estate. the payments (qualify, do not qualify) as alimony and are (included in, excluded from) nell's gross income as they are received. c. nell is to have custody of their 12-year-old son, bobby. she is to receive $1,200 per month until bobby (1) dies or (2) attains age 21 (whichever occurs first). after either of these events occurs, nell will receive only $300 per month for the remainder of her life.$ x per month is alimony that is (included in, excluded from) nell's gross income, and the remaining $ x per month is considered (child support, property settlement) and is (nontaxable, taxable) to nell.
Answers: 3
Business, 22.06.2019 21:50, nakarelinp0p303
scenario: hawaii and south carolina are trading partners. hawaii has an absolute advantage in the production of both coffee and tea. the opportunity cost of producing 1 pound of tea in hawaii is 2 pounds of coffee, and the opportunity cost of producing 1 pound of tea in south carolina is 1/3 pound of coffee. which of the following statements is true? a. south carolina should specialize in the production of both tea and coffee. b. hawaii should specialize in the production of tea, whereas south carolina should specialize in the production of coffee. c. hawaii should specialize in the production of coffee, whereas south carolina should specialize in the production of tea. d. hawaii should specialize in the production of both tea and coffee.
Answers: 1
A door-to-door vendor of vacuum cleaners tells a potential customer that the vacuum cleaners "slurp...
Arts, 18.01.2021 06:10
Mathematics, 18.01.2021 06:10
Mathematics, 18.01.2021 06:10
Mathematics, 18.01.2021 06:10
Biology, 18.01.2021 06:10
Mathematics, 18.01.2021 06:10