Expansionary fiscal policy relies on changes in tax collections and government spending to achieve a non inflationary level of employment. Given this definition, what actions and projected consequences did President Obama enact to realize this goal? Include in your discussion economic conditions that existed prior to the 2008 election, i. e. the mortgage/real estate crisis, employment & unemployment, provisions President Obama used to offset the economic conditions, projected benefits vs projected detriments to the economy.

The actions that President Obama used to enact to realize this goal is when the economy is in expansion, the government should use contractionary fiscal policy.

It should be noted that when an economy is in expansion, the government should use contractionary fiscal policy.

On the other hand, when the economy is in recession, the government will implement an expansionary fiscal policy. This can be done through lower taxes or increase in expenditure.

Read related link on:

link

Orthodox economic theory recommeds the use of countercyclical economic policy, this means:  

President Obama followed the theory and used expansionary fiscal policy to help the economy recover in 2008 and 2009. Expansionary fiscal policty basically consists in either tax cuts, or defitic-financed spending, or both.

Obama mostly used the latter to help people in need of welfare benefits due to unemployment, and to finance economic projects that could employ people.

While the deficit is something to worry about, the United States is a strong country, with a desirable currency: this means that the American government is unlikely to default on its debts, and investors are quick to lend money to it at low interest rates.

The projected benefits of the expansionary fiscal policy where obvious: more economic growth, which means less unemployment.

President Obama was also aided by the Federal Reserve, which implemented expansionary monetary policy (essentially increasing the amount of money that circulates in the economy).

the correct answer is - no.

winnipeg, canada, is not further away from the equator than moscow, russia, in fact moscow is the city that is further away from the equator. moscow is on a latitude of 55.7558° north, while winnipeg is on a latitude of 49.8951° north, thus putting moscow by 5.8607° further away from the equator than winnipeg is.

the definition of a small business is an independently owned and operated company that is limited in size and in revenue depending on the industry. a local bakery that employs 10 people is an example of a small business. a manufacturing facility that employees less than 500 people is an example of a small business.