Business
Business, 23.04.2020 00:46, uchechukwueigwe

Práctica rápida # 1 (Lunes)
(1) Este verano mi familia y yo hicimos un viaje especial al Museo olimpico (2)
Mientras estábamos all aprendi acerca de algunas atletas increibles y de la historia
estadounidense. (3) Una atleta que realmente me llamó la atención fue Gertrude Elderle. (4)
Gertrude Elderle fue la mejor nadadora estadounidense (5) Nació en 1906 en la ciudad de
Nueva York. (6) De niña comenzó a nadar en la casa de verano de su familia (7) No tardo
mucho en convertir la natación en una profesión conpetitiva.
1. Que cambio debe hacerse en la oración 1?
A Cambiar Museo olimpico por museo Olimpico
B. Cambiar Museo olimpico por Museo Olimpico
C. Cambiar hicimos por haremos
D. No es necesario hacer ningún cambio.

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 21.06.2019 23:10, SmokeyRN
Kando company incurs a $9 per unit cost for product a, which it currently manufactures and sells for $13.50 per unit. instead of manufacturing and selling this product, the company can purchase product b for $5 per unit and sell it for $12 per unit. if it does so, unit sales would remain unchanged and $5 of the $9 per unit costs assigned to product a would be eliminated. 1. prepare incremental cost analysis. should the company continue to manufacture product a or purchase product b for resale? (round your answers to 2 decimal places.)
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 00:20, randallmatthew6124
Suppose an economy consists of three sectors: energy (e), manufacturing (m), and agriculture (a). sector e sells 70% of its output to m and 30% to a. sector m sells 30% of its output to e, 50% to a, and retains the rest. sector a sells 15% of its output to e, 30% to m, and retains the rest.
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 07:30, davidleew24
Jewelry manufacturers produce a range of products such as rings, necklaces, bracelets, and brooches. what fundamental economic question are they addressing by offering this range of items?
Answers: 3
image
Business, 22.06.2019 07:50, ShawnSaviro4918
In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Práctica rápida # 1 (Lunes)
(1) Este verano mi familia y yo hicimos un viaje especial al Museo...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 03.07.2019 02:30
Konu
Mathematics, 03.07.2019 02:30
Konu
Biology, 03.07.2019 02:30