Business, 17.04.2020 05:05, tlester2005
Using the payoff matrix, and assuming no collusion between X and Y, what is the likely pricing outcome? A. Both firms will set the price at $35. B. Both firms will set the price at $40. C. Firm X will charge $35 and firm Y will charge $40. D. Firm X will charge $40 and firm Y will charge $35. Price collusion is mutually profitable because each firm achieves A. higher profits. B. increased sales. C. lower costs. D. higher productivity.
Answers: 1
Business, 22.06.2019 02:00, gracye
Kenney co. uses process costing to account for the production of canned energy drinks. direct materials are added at the beginning of the process and conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. equivalent units have been calculated to be 19,200 units for materials and 16,000 units for conversion costs. beginning inventory consisted of $11,200 in materials and $6,400 in conversion costs. april costs were $57,600 for materials and $64,000 for conversion costs. ending inventory still in process was 6,400 units (100% complete for materials, 50% for conversion). the total cost per unit using the weighted average method would be closest to:
Answers: 2
Business, 22.06.2019 21:50, elijahjacksonrp6z2o7
The third program provides families with $50 in food stamps each week, redeemable for both perishable and nonperishable food. the fourth policy instead provides a family with a box of nonperishable foods each week, worth $50. use two graphs to illustrate that a family may be indifferent between the two programs, but will never prefer the $50 box of nonperishable foods over the $50 in food stamps. state your answer and use a consumer choice model for perishable food and nonperishable food to graphically justify your choice.
Answers: 1
Using the payoff matrix, and assuming no collusion between X and Y, what is the likely pricing outco...
Biology, 30.04.2021 22:20
Mathematics, 30.04.2021 22:20
Chemistry, 30.04.2021 22:20