Business
Business, 15.04.2020 02:49, brad59

Target Corporation is a C corporation. T's 1,000 shares of common stock (its only class) are owned by three unrelated individual shareholders as follows:

A: 500 shares; $50,000 adjusted basis; $500,000 FMV

B: 400 shares; $40,000 adjusted basis; $400,000 FMV

C: 100 shares; $140,000 adjusted basis; $100,000 FMV

A and B are in their late 70's and have held their T stock since the company was founded many years ago. C recently inherited her stock.

T has $400,000 of accumulated E&P and the following assets (all held long-term) and liabilities:

Adj. Basis FMV
Cash
$200,000
$200,000
Inventory
50,000
100,000
Equipment ($100,000 §1245 recapture)
100,000
200,000
Building (no recapture)
50,000
300,000
Securities
400,000
300,000
Goodwill
0
200,000
Bank loan
300,000

T and its shareholders are considering a sale of the business. Purchaser Corporation (P) is interested in acquiring T. Assume that C corporations are taxed on all their income at a flat corporate rate of 35% and individuals are taxed at a flat 35% rate on ordinary income and a 15% rate on long-term capital gain.

What are the tax consequences of the following alternative acquisition methods to T, T's shareholders and P?

(a) T adopts a plan of complete liquidation, sells all of its assets (except the cash but subject to the bank loan) to P for $800,000 cash, and distributes the after-tax proceeds to its shareholders in proportion to their stock holdings.

Target Corporation (T):

T's shareholders:

Purchaser Corporation (P):

(b) T adopts a plan of complete liquidation, distributes all of its assets (subject to the liability) to its shareholders in proportion to their stock holdings, and the shareholders then sell the assets (less any cash but subject to the bank loan ) to P for $800,000.

Target Corporation (T):

T's Shareholders:

Purchaser Corporation (P):

(c) In general, how would the results in (a), above, change if P paid T $200,000 cash and $600,000 in notes, with market rate interest payable annually and the entire principal payable in five years?

Target Corporation (T):

T's Shareholders:

Purchaser Corporation (P):

(d) T sells all of its assets (except for the cash but subject to the bank loan) to P as in (a), above, except that T does not liquidate and instead invests the after-tax sales proceeds in a portfolio of publicly traded securities.

Target Corporation (T):

T's Shareholders:

Purchaser Corporation (P):

(e)(1) P purchases all the stock of T for $800/share and makes a §338 election.

Target Corporation (T):

T's Shareholders:

Purchaser Corporation (P):

(e)(2) Why didn't P pay $1,000/share for the T stock?

(f) P purchases all the stock of T for cash but does not make the §338 election. (Consider generally what P should pay for the T stock).

Target Corporation (T):

T's Shareholders:

Purchaser Corporation (P):

(g) Assuming P and T are indifferent to the form of the transaction, would you recommend the acquisition method in (a) (purchase of assets) , (e) (purchase of stock with §338 election) or (f) (purchase of stock without §338 election), above?

(h) Would your recommendation in (g), above, change if T had $600,000 in NOL carryovers?

(i) Assume that T is a wholly-owned subsidiary of S, Inc., and S has a $200,000 adjusted basis in its T stock. What result if T distributes all of its assets (subject to the liability) to S in complete liquidation, and S then sells the assets to P?

(j) Same as (i), above, except P insists that the transaction must be structured as an acquisition of T stock.

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 21.06.2019 21:00, castiaulii16
The market for corn in country a is highly competitive. at the current market price of $5/bushel there is a shortage of 100,000 bushels of corn in this country. media reports claim that the price of corn will rise drastically in the near future. according to these reports, the neighboring country b had witnessed a similar situation recently. at the same price, the shortage in country b was also 100,000 bushels and eventually the equilibrium price in b went up to $10/bushel. both countries are known to have equal number of corn producers and the market supply of corn is identical at all prices. this, combined with the fact that consumers in the two countries also have similar tastes and preferences, led the media to conclude that the price of corn in country a would soon be as high as $10/bushel. the new equilibrium price turns out to be below $10/bushel, what inferences can be drawn?
Answers: 3
image
Business, 22.06.2019 16:00, anonymous1813
Winners of the georgia lotto drawing are given the choice of receiving the winning amount divided equally over 2121 years or as a lump-sum cash option amount. the cash option amount is determined by discounting the annual winning payment at 88% over 2121 years. this week the lottery is worth $1616 million to a single winner. what would the cash option payout be?
Answers: 3
image
Business, 22.06.2019 16:20, Zshotgun33
Suppose you hold a portfolio consisting of a $10,000 investment in each of 8 different common stocks. the portfolio's beta is 1.25. now suppose you decided to sell one of your stocks that has a beta of 1.00 and to use the proceeds to buy a replacement stock with a beta of 1.55. what would the portfolio's new beta be? do not round your intermediate calculations.
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 20:30, Roof55
When patey pontoons issued 4% bonds on january 1, 2018, with a face amount of $660,000, the market yield for bonds of similar risk and maturity was 5%. the bonds mature december 31, 2021 (4 years). interest is paid semiannually on june 30 and december 31?
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Target Corporation is a C corporation. T's 1,000 shares of common stock (its only class) are owned b...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
English, 03.06.2021 21:40