Congressman Smith and Congresswoman Johnson both consider themselves advocates for the national parks and are introducing different bills designed to benefit the parks. Congressman Smith’s bill calls for an increase in the entrance fees. Congresswoman Johnson’s bill calls for a decrease in the entrance fees. Which of the bills would be more effective at ensuring the quality of the national parks?

a. either bill would be effective.

b. Both bills would be equally effective.

c. Congresswoman Johnson’s bill because more visitors means more citizens will value and care for the parks

d. Congressman Smith’s bill because it will reduce the overuse of the parks

Congressman Smith's bill because it will reduce the overuse of the parks

Explanation:

When people use the park, their activities are more likely to create some sort of degradation to the parks quality. For example, children can spoil their drinks and foods there, pulling out the grass, destroying the land while playing sports, etc.

As the price of a certain product increase, the demand for that product would decrease. Increasing the entrance fees will lead  lesser amount of people who enter the park. This will minimize the degradation process

the correct answer would be b, when, queen, calder hall and london.

explanation:

we always capitalize words when a paragraph or sentence is starting, when an important name is used, when a place is being written, or simply when a noun is used, etc. so in this sentence, sentence is starting from 'when', so it will be written in capital letters. secondly, queen is considered to be an important person, so it will also be written in capital letter. next, the name of the town is mentioned, i-e calder hall, which will also be written in capital letters. in the last,   city name is being used, 'london', which will also be written in capital letters. so option b is the most appropriate one.