Stapleton Manufacturing intends to increase capacity through the addition of new equipment. Two vendors have presented proposals. The fixed cost for proposal A is $57 comma 000, and for proposal B, $31 comma 000. The variable cost for A is $12, and for B, $16. The revenue generated by each unit is $18. a) What is the crossover point for the two options? The crossover point for the two options is nothing units. (Round your response to the nearest whole number.) b) At an expected volume of 4 comma 600 units, which alternative should be chosen? The profit (loss) if proposal A is accepted and 4 comma 600 units are produced is $ nothing. (Round your response to the nearest dollar and include a minus sign if necessary.) The profit (loss) if proposal B is accepted and 4 comma 600 units are produced is $ nothing. (Round your response to the nearest dollar and include a minus sign if necessary.) ▼ Proposal A Proposal B should be chosen at an expected volume of 4 comma 600 units.

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court. the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court. because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located. because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center. because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.