A reporter appears on television and reports that a collegiate athlete is currently using steroids. The reporter has a sincere belief that the information is true. Subsequently, it is determined that the information is false and inaccurate.
1. If the athlete files a lawsuit, most courts would find which of the following?
a. The reporter is not liable for the statements because of the sincerely held belief on behalf of the reporter.
b. The reporter is not liable because the athlete is considered a public figure.
c. The reporter is liable for a claim of slander.
d. The reporter is liable for a claim of libel.

The answer is D, the reporter is liable for a claim of libel

Explanation:

First of, we need to understand that libel in it self refers to a false statement or report published against an individual and of which the report has a very high tendency of tarnishing the individuals image. In order words, it can also be refereed to as the defamation of character where the victim in this case is refereed to as the character.

So,  referring back to the question. As a reporter, it is assumed that proper diligence has been done in respect to investigation or investigative journalism as some like to call it before going before the public to declare such a defaming statement and in such a case where such sequentially, the statement comes to be a false statement, the reporter and in some cases the firm at large is liable for a claim of libel.

So as related to the question asked, the answer is D.

idk just tryinna get some points skskksksks

advanced placement tests