Business, 29.03.2020 11:38, mehokkj

Is there one best way of managment explain

Answers: 3

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Business

Business, 21.06.2019 17:00, santos200154

The typical consumer's food basket in the base year 2015 is as follows: 30 chickens at $4 each 10 hams at $5 each 10 steaks at $8 each a chicken feed shortage causes the price of chickens to rise to $5.00 each in the year 2016. hams rise to $7.00 each, and the price of steaks is unchanged. a. calculate the change in the "cost-of-eating" index between 2015 and 2016. year cost of the basket 2015 $ 2016 $ instructions: enter your responses rounded to one decimal place. the official cost-of-eating index has by %. b. suppose that consumers are completely indifferent between two chickens and one ham. for this example, how large is the substitution bias in the official "cost-of-eating" index? the in the cost-of-eating index is %. the of inflation in the cost of eating reflects substitution bias.

Answers: 3

continue

Business, 22.06.2019 20:00, kickdoedon

During the month of march 2017, weimar world, a tax-preparation service, had the following transactions. * billed $496,000 in revenues on credit * received $164,000 from customers' accounts receivable * incurred expenses of $194,000 but only paid $87,700 cash for these expenses * prepaid $32,220 for computer services to be used next month what was the company's accrual basis net income for the month? select one: a. $302,000 b. $264,080 c. $ 41,860 d. $408,300 e. none of the above

Answers: 3

continue

Business, 22.06.2019 21:00, crazylogic963

China's new 5 percent tax on disposable wooden chopsticks, reflecting concerns about deforestation, has been praised by environmentalists. the move is hitting hard at the japanese, who consume 25 billion set of wooden chopsticks annually. almost all of the chopsticks used in japan come from china. the reuirements for chinese manufacturers of wooden chopsticks to pay the 5 percent tax is a factor in their external environment.

Answers: 3

continue

Business, 23.06.2019 00:00, ldelgado97

Wo firms, a and b, each currently dump 50 tons of chemicals into the local river. the government has decided to reduce the pollution and from now on will require a pollution permit for each ton of pollution dumped into the river. it costs firm a $100 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates before it reaches the river, and it costs firm b $50 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates before it reaches the river. the government gives each firm 20 pollution permits. government officials are not sure whether to allow the firms to buy or sell the pollution permits to each other. what is the total cost of reducing pollution if firms are not allowed to buy and sell pollution permits from each other? what is the total cost of reducing pollution if the firms are allowed to buy and sell permits from each other? a. $3,000; $1,500 b. $4,500; $3,500 c. $4,500; $4,000 d. $4,500; $2,500

Answers: 3

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

Is there one best way of managment explain...