A diverse team is better than a homogeneous team:
a. when designing and launching a new product or service. on tasks requiring a high degree of cooperation.
b. in situations where the team must reach the performing stage of team development quickly.
c. in most organizational activities as they will have fewer conflicts.
d. if the team is working on a project that involves routine tasks.

The correct answer is option B) A diverse team is better than a homogeneous team in situations where the team must reach the performing stage of team development quickly.

Explanation:

Diverse teams will bring broader ideas and new perspectives to the table and will also be more productive and much more desirable to work for.

Increased team diversity results in better decision making. According to the research, teams outperform individual decision makers 66% of the time, and decision making improves as team diversity increases

Diversity can help ensure that a team has the skills and knowledge necessary for the successful completion of tasks on time.

In situations where the team must reach the performing stage of team development quickly, diverse teams with a god management system is the best option as tend to be more creative and achieve goals more efficiently.

A) when designing and launching a new product or service.

Explanation:

Diversity is important when designing and developing a new product or service because diverse people will tend to have different opinions and ideas. The more ideas you can come up with at the first stages, the better.

As the development process continues, the team usually requires the participation of people from different units, e.g. product design, marketing, finance, manufacturing, etc., and everyone is responsible for checking how plausible the new product is.

E.g. imagine that the product design unit developed a great phone, uses 3D holograms, works better than any other phone the competition might offer, its battery lasts for a whole month, whatever you might imagine, want or need, but it costs $50,000 to produce. At that point you realize that someone from the financial department would have stopped that non-sense before wasting so much time.  

answer: most likely c

explanation: