Would it have been better for Ms. Torti to argue that she was providing medical treatment and have the court deal with the issue of what constitutes medical care rather than the issue of immunity?

No, it would not be a better idea

Explanation:

If Ms. Torti argued that she was providing medical assistance, then the Law would protect Ms. Torti’s immunity. But, had the questioned would have arose if Ms. Torti was medically trained or she was aware that it needs medically trained personnel to provide such care at a scene of emergency. This would be a direct attack on the defendant’s cause. I do not think that it would have been a better idea.

answer; i do believe that the correct answer is (c)///management,unions, lobbyists and

being born in poverty would limit the people's chances, opportunities and benefits.

this happen because of several things, such as:

- poor people tend to gain less access to good education and nutrition. this mean that their chance to obtain high paying jobs would also be limited.

- poor people tend to socialize with other poor people while the rich tend to socialize with other rich people. this means that simply throguh their social circle, rich people would have more business opportunities compared to the poor people.

- rich people tend to have more capital in their disposal. this would benefit them in business since it is far easier for them to fund their business operation compared to poor people.