Scenario 12.2 Buckyballs was marketed as a desk toy made up of small magnetic spheres. Adults could play with the magnetic spheres and create different shapes. Labeling on Buckyballs packaging clearly stated that this product should be kept away from children. As concerns for safety grew, Buckyballs placed even more warning labels on the packaging. Despite this fact, thousands of children who thought the magnets were candy ingested them. The magnets could cause fatal complications inside the body. If more than one was swallowed, they could attract one another inside the stomach, creating tearing and other complications. Despite all the warnings, the Consumer Product Safety Commission ruled the product was too dangerous and filed a lawsuit. Though Buckyballs magnets were discontinued, they have since returned under the name Zen Magnets. Refer to Scenario 12.2. The company was forced to delete its magnetic desk toy product due to safety concerns after being sued by the Consumer Product Safety Commission. What type of product deletion did the firm most likely use?

Steffi is reviewing various licenses and their uses. match the licenses to their respective uses. you are eligible to work within the state. you are eligible to sell limited investment securities. you are eligible to sell fixed income investment products. your compensation is fee based. section 6 section 7 section 63 section 65

In a team environment, a coordinator is? a person with expert knowledge or skills in a particular area the team needs. a good listener who works to resolve social problems among teammates. a leader who team members focus on their tasks. a good networker who likes to explore new ideas and possiblities.

Reliability and validity reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. in the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways. unfortunately, being consistent in measurement does not necessarily mean that you have measured something correctly. to illustrate this concept, consider a kitchen scale that would be used to measure the weight of cereal that you eat in the morning. if the scale is not properly calibrated, it may consistently under- or overestimate the amount of cereal that’s being measured. while the scale is highly reliable in producing consistent results (e. g., the same amount of cereal poured onto the scale produces the same reading each time), those results are incorrect. this is where validity comes into play. validity refers to the extent to which a given instrument or tool accurately measures what it’s supposed to measure. while any valid measure is by necessity reliable, the reverse is not necessarily true. researchers strive to use instruments that are both highly reliable and valid.