Business
Business, 18.03.2020 02:45, jahootey2798

The effects of property rights on achieving efficiency

Consider a river found in the city of Philadelphia, and then answer the questions that follow.

The city has a hiking lodge whose visitors use the river for recreation. The city also has a chemical plant that dumps industrial waste into the river. This pollutes the river and makes it a less desirable vacation destination. That is, the chemical plant's waste decreases the hiking lodge's economic profit.

8. The effects of property rights on achieving eff

Suppose that the chemical plant could use a different production method that involves recycling water. This would reduce the pollution in the river to levels safe for recreation, and the hiking lodge would no longer be affected. If the chemical plant uses the recycling method, then the chemical plant's economic profit is $1,500 per week, and the hiking lodge's economic profit is $1,800 per week. If the chemical plant does not use the recycling method, then the chemical plant's economic profit is $2,000 per week, and the hiking lodge's economic profit is $1,000 per week. These figures are summarized in the following table.

Complete the following table by computing the total profit (the chemical plant's economic profit and the hiking lodge's economic profit combined) with and without recycling.

Action

Profit

Chemical Plant

Hiking Lodge

Total

(Dollars)

(Dollars)

(Dollars)

No Recycling 2,000 1,000
Recycling 1,500 1,800
Total economic profit is highest when the recycling production method is (not used/Used).

When the chemical plant uses the recycling method, the hiking lodge earns more per week than it does with no recycling. Therefore, the hiking lodge should be willing to pay up to $800 per week for the chemical plant to recycle water. However, the recycling method decreases the chemical plant's economic profit by per week. Therefore, the chemical plant should be willing to use the recycling method if it is compensated with at least $500 per week.

Suppose the hiking lodge has the property rights to the river. That is, the hiking lodge has the right to a clean (unpolluted) river. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the chemical plant will (use/ not use) the recycling method and will pay the hiking lodge(A. 0 per week) (B. between 0 and 300 per week) (C. between 300 and 500 per week) (D. between 500 and 800 per week) per week.

Now, suppose the chemical plant has the property rights to the river, including the right to pollute it. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the chemical plant will(not use/use) the recycling method, and the hiking lodge will pay the chemical plant (A. 0 per week) (B. between 0 and 300 per week) (C. between 300 and 500 per week) (D. between 500 and 800 per week) per week. per week.

The chemical plant will make the most economic profit when .

True or False: The river will remain polluted, regardless of who has the property rights.

True

False

Grade It Now

Save & Continue

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 22.06.2019 11:00, montgomerykarloxc24x
You decide to invest in a portfolio consisting of 25 percent stock a, 25 percent stock b, and the remainder in stock c. based on the following information, what is the expected return of your portfolio? state of economy probability of state return if state occurs of economy stock a stock b stock c recession .16 - 16.4 % - 2.7 % - 21.6 % normal .55 12.6 % 7.3 % 15.9 % boom .29 26.2 % 14.6 % 30.5 %
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 11:00, nathanbrockdac
Using a cps-sample of 7,440 individuals, you estimate the following regression: = 20.91 - 2.61 x female where female is a binary variable that takes on the value of 1 for females and is 0 otherwise. the standard error on the coefficient on female is 0.25. the 95% confidence interval for the gender wage gap, or the amount that females earn less, is: a) [-3.10, -2.12] b) [18.30, 23.52] c) [-3.02, -2.20] d) [-1.96, -1.64]
Answers: 3
image
Business, 22.06.2019 21:20, hailiemanuel3461
Which of the following best explains why large companies pay less for goods from wholesalers? a. large companies are able to pay for the goods they purchase in cash. b. large companies are able to increase the efficiency of wholesale production. c. large companies can buy all or most of a wholesaler's stock. d. large companies have better-paid employees who are better negotiators.
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 21:30, mjstew00763
An allergy products superstore buys 6000 of their most popular model of air filters each year. the price of the air filters is $18. the cost of ordering and receiving shipments is $12 per order. accounting estimates annual carrying costs are 20% of the price. the supplier lead time is 2 days. the store operates 240 days per year. each order is received from the supplier in a single delivery. there are no quantity discounts. what is the store’s minimum total annual cost of placing orders & carrying inventory?
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
The effects of property rights on achieving efficiency

Consider a river found in the cit...

Questions in other subjects: