Matt tells Ron that the snow boots he is selling offer protection for temperatures of 20° below zero. Ron orders a pair for his trip to Greenland. Upon delivery, Ron sees that the box states "will protect your feet in temperatures down to 30° below zero." The first night's temperature goes down to 27 below. Ron suffers frostbite on all of his toes. Ron then sues for breach of warranty. What is the result?

A) Breach, because the latter express warranty is valid.

Explanation:

Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the result would be a breach. This is mainly due to the fact that the box stated that "will protect your feet in temperatures down to 30° below zero." and this is a valid express warranty that is being marketed by the company that created the product. Therefore since the temperature did not go below 30 and Ron still suffered frostbite then he can rightfully sue.

false. insurance companies differ from the pricing to the different deals you can get.

answer; i believe that the correct answer is client agreement;