A contractor used dynamite to loosen a rocky hillside. The blast from the dynamite caused a house foundation to crack. The house was located over a half-mile away from the dynamite site. The contractor was careful when using the dynamite and no allegation of negligence is made. However, the house owner claims the contractor is liable for damage to the foundation. Is the house owner correct?Explain.

Answer and explanation:

The house owner is correct because strict liability applies in the case. Strict liability refers to the responsibility an individual or organization has over actions incurred even if there was no intention of causing property or personal injuries. Strict liability only considers if the action was the result of the damage.

The assertion that could be made regarding the given situation would be as follows:

Yes, the house owner is correct under the term of "strict liability."

Learn more about "Contractor" here:

link

i tried to find the answe for you im sorry.

the correct answer is:

it required the president to inform congress within forty-eight hours of any new troop commitment.

the war powers resolution (1973) is a federal law designed to limit the u.s. president’s ability to initiate or intensify military actions abroad without the approval of the congress.

it establishes that the president can send armed forces into action abroad only by declaration of war by congress, statutory authorization, or in case of a national emergency created by attack upon the united states, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.

it requires the president to notify congress within 48 hours of sending armed forces to military action.