Salvatore and Annette are sales managers for Acme USA. Both work full-time in the Acme offices under the same manager, and share the same type of job responsibilities. Salvatore was hired as an employee, and is paid a salary. Required federal and state tax withholdings are made by Acme for Salvatore. Annette was hired as an independent contractor, and is paid by the project. No federal and state withholdings are taken for Annette, and she does not receive retirement or health insurance benefits. Which of the following is the likely true?

a. Acme properly classified Annette as an independent contractor.
b. Acme willfully misclassified Annette as an independent contractor and is liable under Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.
c. Acme has no rights to withhold federal and state taxes for Salvatore if he is classifed as a full-time employee.
d. Acme has to provide more health and retirement benefits to Annette than Salvatore because Annette is an independent contractor.

Which type of data is generally stored in different file formats, such as text files, spreadsheets, and so on?

Singer and mcmann are partners in a business. singer’s original capital was $40,000 and mcmann’s was $60,000. they agree to salaries of $12,000 and $18,000 for singer and mcmann respectively and 10% interest on original capital. if they agree to share remaining profits and losses on a 3: 2 ratio, what will mcmann’s share of the income be if the income for the year was $15,000?

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court. the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court. because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located. because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center. because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.