4. Claudia has the following preferences over two goods, c and d: U(c, d) = min{c/2, 3d) Let pc = 2 and pd=3. a. What combination of c and d will give Claudia exactly 18 units of utility at the lowest possible cost? b. How much will this bundle cost? c. If the price of c rises to 3 and the price of d stays the same, will the expenditure minimizing bundle change? Why or why not? d. Solve for Claudia’s Hicksian demand functions for c and d. e. Write down Claudia’s expenditure function E(pc, pd , U). f. Using Shephard’s Lemma, derive Claudia’s Hicksian demand function for d.

All the parts of questions are explained in the attached files. Please have a look.

Explanation:

Via:   "if you are found to be supplying or dealing drugs, the punishment is likely to be tough. supplying drugs doesn’t just apply to dealers. if police suspect that you intend to share drugs with your friends, this is still considered to be supplying.

being suspected of supplying drugs means you are much more likely to be charged. the amount of drugs found on you, and whether you have a criminal record, will be taken into account when a punishment is being decided.

decisions to prosecute are taken by the public prosecution service. the maximum sentences for intent to supply drugs are:

- up to life in prison or an unlimited fine (or both) for a class a drug- up to 14 years in prison or an unlimited fine (or both) for a class b or class c drug."sorry if this was a school question, you didnt supply options so i assumed it was a personal question, which if it is, reconsider selling or having possesion of any drugs at all. i wish you the best!

Answer reflected in reasonable, documented employment policies that are honestly and equitable implemented to the satisfaction of both management and employee;