Business, 05.03.2020 03:55, cexe2630

Which of the following is correct for Qualified Tuition Programs? a. Contributions are deductible and qualified educational expense distributions are tax-free. b. Contributions are deductible and qualified educational expense distributions are taxable. c. Contributions are not deductible and qualified educational expense distributions are taxable. d. Contributions are not deductible and qualified educational expense distributions are tax-free.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Business

Business, 23.06.2019 01:30, desimond01

Jodie lives in a developing nation where the local markets are underdeveloped in terms of domestic exposure. her country wants to boost these domestic industries in the face of heavy competition from foreign players in the market. which trade practice should jodie’s country adopt to shield its domestic industries from foreign players? jodie’s country should adopt to shield its domestic industries from foreign players. typing answer

Answers: 1

continue

Business, 23.06.2019 02:30, PinkyUSA18

Complete electronics inc. sells a point-of-sale computer with a two-year service contract. complete collects $ 2 comma 500 cash for the selling price of the computer and $ 576 for the two-year service contract. how is revenue recognized?

Answers: 2

continue

Business, 23.06.2019 15:00, Osorio5116

How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.

Answers: 1

continue

Business, 23.06.2019 17:30, sashie0

Monthly price data for mdltx and ekwax from yahoo finance is contained in the excel spreadsheet for this exercise. there are 37 months of price data for the period from september 2009 to september 2012. (note: these prices already incorporate dividend payments.) the 36 monthly returns for each fund are also provided. calculate average (arithmetic) monthly return and standard deviation for each fund. you can use the excel functions average, stdev to derive these stats. annualize these statistics. use the correl function in excel to derive the correlation coefficient between the two sets of returns. (annual correlation is the same as monthly correlation. hence, no need to annualize this stat.) using the annualized statistics derived in step 1, compute the expected return and standard deviation for portfolios containing from 0% to 100% mdltx (and 100% to 0% ekwax) by 10% increments. graph the resulting portfolios. based on your analysis, is there any potential benefit to diversification across these two funds? explain. of the 11 portfolios you graphed, which are efficient?

Answers: 1

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

Which of the following is correct for Qualified Tuition Programs? a. Contributions are deductible an...