Martin Farley and Ashley Clark formed a limited liability company with an operating agreement that provided a salary allowance of $40,000 and $30,000 to each member respectively. In addition, the operating agreement specified an income-sharing ratio of respectively. In addition, the operating agreement specified an income sharing ratio of 3:2. The two members withdrew amounts equal to their salary allowances. a) Determine the division of $148,000 net income for the year. b) Provide journal entries to close the (1) income summary and (2) drawing accounts for the two members. c) If the net income were less than the sum of the salary allowances, how would income be divided between the two members of the LLC?

Boteck is a full-service technology company. it provides equipment, installation services, and training services. customers can purchase any product or service separately or as a bundled package. on may 3, box-rite corporation purchased computer equipment, installation, and training for a total cost of $120,000. estimated stand-alone fair values of the equipment, installation, and training are $75,000, $50,000, and $25,000 respectively. the journal entry to record the sale and installation on may 3 will include select one:

For each example identify the most appropriate ctso

Alandowner and his neighbor purchased adjoining undeveloped lots. after both built homes on their respective lots, the landowner suggested to the neighbor that a common driveway be built where the two lots joined. the neighbor agreed. the landowner and the neighbor split the cost of constructing the driveway and entered into a written agreement to equally share the costs of its upkeep and maintenance. the agreement was recorded in the county recorder's office. two years later, the neighbor built a new driveway located entirely on his lot. the common driveway, which the landowner continued to use but which the neighbor no longer used, began to deteriorate. the landowner asked the neighbor for money to maintain the common driveway, but the neighbor refused to contribute. three years later, the neighbor conveyed his lot to a friend. the friend entered into possession and used only the driveway built by the neighbor. by this time, the common driveway had deteriorated badly and contained numerous potholes. the landowner asked the friend to pay half of what it would take to repair the common driveway. the friend refused. the landowner repaired the driveway and sued the friend for 50% of the cost of repairs. will the landowner prevail?