This problem has been solved!
See the answer
The state of Idaho has a two- year statute of limitations for personal injury actions. Graham was injured by Alice in a car accident on January 1,2011. If Graham wants to bring a lawsuit against Alice on January 15,2013, which of the following is most likely to be the outcome?

A) Graham can sue Alice but will not receive damages.
b) Graham is allowed to sue Alive after appealing for an extension of the statue of limitations.
c) Graham can sue Alice but is not entitled to a jury trial. d) Graham is not allowed to sue Alice, having lost his right to sue her.

Option (D) Graham is not allowed to sue Alice, having lost his right to sue her.

Explanation:

The reason is that the plaintiff can only sue the party who damage him / her in a limited period of time. Because the longer the period has lapsed the greater are the chances that the court would think that the plaintiff has forgiven the other party. So once you have forgiven the other party you have no right to sue the company again. The statute of limitations establishes the period in which the case by the plaintiff must be filed against the defendant. So we can see that Graham is unable to sue Alice because the time of suing Alice is passed. It has been 4 years now, Graham has no right to sue Alice now.

answer///the stewardship worldview;