Consider the following statements: "Inner-city household interviewing is especially difficult and expensive. This survey involves substantial inner-city household interviewing. The interviewing in this survey will be especially difficult and expensive." This is an example of .
a. an empirical argument
b. an inductive argument
c. an exposition
d. a deductive argument

d. a deductive argument

Explanation:

Deductive argument is one that is conveyed as the arguer to be seductively valid, and conclusions bare drawn from this argument.

So the argument here is that inner city household interviews are difficult and expensive.

Based on this argument, the fact that we are carrying out substantial inner city household interviews now will mean that they will be expensive.

The truth of the conclusion is dependent on the validity of the first argument.

a progressive tax is a tax that imposes a lower tax rate on low-income earners compared to those with a higher income, making it based on the taxpayer's ability to pay. that means it takes a bigger percentage from high income earners than it does from low income people.

the investment was $14,174.196

explanation:

a lump sum means that the father of the example made one deposit and leave it be.

we need to know the value of a capital that generated at 4.05% per year during 28 years the sum of $48,613.24

now clearing the formula to solve for capital we got:

and we reach the answer investment = $14,174.20