Melissa is a self-employed lawyer who chooses a higher-priced restaurant 2 miles from home over a cheaper restaurant 15 miles from home. which of the following is the most likely explanation for her behavior?
a. the opportunity cost of her time is very low.
b. she doesn't take travel time into consideration.
c. she doesn't like to cook or doesn't know how.
d. the prices at the more expensive restaurant understate the opportunity cost of eating there.
e. the higher monetary cost of the more expensive restaurant is offset by the higher opportunity cost of the lower-priced restaurant

Option (E) is correct.

Explanation:

The opportunity cost refers to the benefits that are sacrificed by choosing some other alternative.

In our case, there are two restaurants as follows:

One is 2 miles away from home with higher prices

Second one is 15 miles away from home with lower prices

But Melissa chooses the first one by comparing the opportunity cost associated with each option relative to the other option.

This is because of the higher opportunity cost associated with second restaurant offsets the higher monetary cost of the first restaurant.

you had 23.00$ because 28 - 5 = 23 then put it in dollar form

bd = 9 cm

step-by-step explanation:

in a 30°-60°-90° triangle, the ratio of side lengths is 1 : √3 : 2. that is, the longest side (hypotenuse) is twice the length of the shortest side.

all of the triangles in your geometry are 30°-60°-90° triangles. ac is the hypotenuse of δacd, and the short side of δabc.

the short side ad of δacd will be half the length of ac, so 3 cm. the hypotenuse ab of δabc will be twice the length of ac, so 12 cm. segment bd is the difference of the lengths ab and ad, so is

bd = ab -ad

bd = 12 cm - 3 cm = 9 cm

comment on side length ratios

you can figure the ratios of side lengths in a 30°-60°-90° triangle by considering the trig ratios of the angles. or you can figure the length of the altitude of an equilateral triangle of side length 2 using the pythagorean theorem.