Trein, inc. entered into a one-year, $1 million contract with mia, a sports celebrity, to promote trein's products. e-presto inc., a competitor of trein, was interested in having mia promote its products but knew of her contract with trein. e-presto offered mia a three-year, $5 million contract. during the first year under contract with trein, mia left trein and signed with e-presto. if trein sues e-presto for tortious interference with a contract, e-presto

If Trein sues E-presto for tortious interference with a contract, E-presto is liable for tortious interference with a contract.

Explanation:

A tort is a violation of a duty imposed by civil law , i.e. a civil wrong.

Tortious interference refers to one company, A, interfering with the contract of another company, B. This interference must be intentional, and must result in a financial, reputational or business relations damage to company B.

answer; consideration;