Business
Business, 20.12.2019 05:31, alyssa32900

Johnson marine has the following costs and expected sales for the coming year. johnson is considering a number of different methods to determine the price of its product. total costs variable manufacturing $ 2,350,000 variable selling and administrative 750,000 plant-level fixed overhead 1,200,000 fixed selling and administrative 600,000 batch-level fixed overhead 200,000 total investment in product line 10,000,000 expected sales (units) 20,000 if johnson determines price using a desired gross margin percentage of 50%, the price is:

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 22.06.2019 07:50, sis212
Connors academy reported inventory in the 2017 year-end balance sheet, using the fifo method, as $154,000. in 2018, the company decided to change its inventory method to lifo. if the company had used the lifo method in 2017, the company estimates that ending inventory would have been in the range $130,000-$135,000. what adjustment would connors make for this change in inventory method?
Answers: 1
image
Business, 23.06.2019 10:50, zurfluhe
In the context in which your reading material uses the term traffic patterns are
Answers: 1
image
Business, 23.06.2019 12:00, aliciagore
Rich is researching for an economics paper on the history of exchange rates between the us and great britain. the best choice for rich to use is
Answers: 3
image
Business, 23.06.2019 15:00, Osorio5116
How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Johnson marine has the following costs and expected sales for the coming year. johnson is considerin...

Questions in other subjects: