Megan was employed by a large company. her supervisor told her to falsify government reports. she refused and was fired. she sued for wrongful discharge. her employer claimed that, since megan was an at-will employee, she had no legal right to claim the company was liable for damages. is the employer right?

1. yes. an at-will employee does not have a legal right to claim wrongful discharge of employment.
2. yes. as an employee, megan owes a duty of loyalty to her employer. if the company was found to have acted illegally by falsifying the reports, it (not megan) would be liable.
3. no. though at-will employees do not have extensive rights relative to job security, they may not be legally fired for refusing to perform an illegal act.
4. no. even though megan was an at-will employee, such employees may not be fired without just cause.

Suppose the government decides to issue a new savings bond that is guaranteed to double in value if you hold it for 20 years. assume you purchase a bond that costs $25. a. what is the exact rate of return you would earn if you held the bond for 20 years until it doubled in value? (do not round intermediate calculations and enter your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places, e. g., 32.16.) b. if you purchased the bond for $25 in 2017 at the then current interest rate of .27 percent year, how much would the bond be worth in 2027? (do not round intermediate calculations and round your answer to 2 decimal places, e. g., 32.16.) c. in 2027, instead of cashing in the bond for its then current value, you decide to hold the bond until it doubles in face value in 2037. what annual rate of return will you earn over the last 10 years? (do not