Amanufacturer could try to defend itself against charges of price discrimination under the robinson-patman act by claiming that: any price differences were to "meet competition in good faith."the price differences did not injure competition. the price differences were justified on the basis of cost differences. the products were not of "like grade and quality."all of the above are possible defenses against price discrimination charges.

Which two of the following are benefits of consumer programs

The cost of labor is significantly lower in many countries than in the united states. if you move manufacturing to a facility to a country labeled as part of the axis of evil and a threat to world peace you will increase the net income of your client by $10 million per the facility is located in a country which limits personal freedom and engages in state sponsored terrorism. imagine you are a marketing consultant. (a) what would you tell the executives to do? (b) what are the alternatives? what are your recommendations? why do you recommend this course of action?

Coop inc. owns 40% of chicken inc., both coop and chicken are corporations. chicken pays coop a dividend of $10,000 in the current year. chicken also reports financial accounting earnings of $20,000 for that year. assume coop follows the general rule of accounting for investment in chicken. what is the amount and nature of the book-tax difference to coop associated with the dividend distribution (ignoring the dividends received deduction)?