Mike karanikolas wants to enter the french market with his usual strategy of using influencers. two influencers are considered to be hired.
the first one is a young growing personality and asks for a consideration of 100 000€ to be paid at the start of the contract, and mike determines that over 4 years, this particular influencer would yield successively each year: 20 000€, 30 000€, 40 000€, 50 000€. those amounts would be actualised at a 10% rate to take risk into account.
is it a good investment? answer to this question based on two selection criteria: net present value and internal rate of return.

the second influencer is more stable and is asking for the same 100 000€ consideration, but revenues would be more stable at 35 000€ every year at the end of the next 4 years.
is the second influencer a better choice than the first influencer? answer to this question based on the npv criterion.

Problem 8-6 cullumber company is a multi product firm. presented below is information concerning one of its products, the hawkeye. date transaction quantity price/cost 1/1 beginning inventory 2,700 $17 2/4 purchase 3,700 26 2/20 sale 4,200 43 4/2 purchase 4,700 33 11/4 sale 3,900 47 calculate average-cost per unit. (round answer to 4 decimal places, e. g. 2.7613.) average-cost per unit $ link to text compute cost of goods sold, assuming cullumber uses: (round average cost per unit to 4 decimal places, e. g. 2.7631 and final answers to 0 decimal places, e. g. 6,548.) cost of goods sold (a) periodic system, fifo cost flow $ (b) perpetual system, fifo cost flow $ (c) periodic system, lifo cost flow $ (d) perpetual system, lifo cost flow $ (e) periodic system, weighted-average cost flow $ (f) perpetual system, moving-average cost flow $ click if you would like to show work for this question: open show work