Nellie orally agreed to hire handyman construction to build a cherry mantle for her fireplace for $1,750. the mantle was going to be specially manufactured. handyman construction obtained all the material for the job. before handyman construction started work on the mantle, nellie contacted the company and told it that she no longer wanted the mantle. handyman construction sued nellie for breach of contract, and she raised the defense that the contract was not in writing as required by the statute of frauds. handyman construction then countered that the writing was not needed because the mantle was going to be specially manufactured. what result? handyman construction prevails because it specially manufactured the ramp. handyman construction prevails because the materials could not be used for other jobs. handyman construction loses because the materials could be used for other jobs. handyman construction loses because the contract needed to be in writing.