Projecting nopat and noa using parsimonious forecasting method following are cisco systems sales, net operating profit after tax (nopat, and net operating assets (noa) for its year ended july 31. 2016 ($ millions) finish atte sales net operating profit after tax (nopat) net operating assets (noa) $49,247 10,575 26,472 use the parsimonious method to forecast cisco's sales, nopat, and noa for years 2017 through 2020 using the following assumptions sales growth per year 1.0% for 2017and 2.0% thereafter net operating profit margin (nopm) net operating asset turnover (noat), based on noa at july 31, 2016 rounding instructions: 21.5% 1.86 . round total revenue "unrounded" to two decimal places -round total revenue "rounded, nopat and noa answers to the nearest whole number. for nopat and noa computations, use total revenue "rounded" 2018 est. 2019 est. 2020 est. 2017 est s millions total revenue (unrounded) total revenue (rounded) nopat noa

Add the mips assembly language instructions (after main: ) to complete the following (in this order). do not skip steps. use other registers as needed. actions: 1. initialize the register $s0 to 35 2. prompt the user to enter a number, read the number and then put it into register $s1 3. prompt the user to enter a number, read the number and then put it into register $s2 4. store the value in $s1 into the memory at address 0x10010000. 5. store the value in $s2 into the memory at address 0x10010004. 6. calculate the value of $s0 - $s1 $s2 and store the result in the memory at address 0x10010008. 7. print the following output each on its own line. you will need to determine the location of each of the strings from the beginning of the memory segment a. your name b. the value in address 0x10010000 c. the value in address 0x10010004 d. the value in address 0x10010008 8. exchange or swap the values in $s1 and $s2 9. set the value in $s0 to -$s0

In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?

One of the benefits of a well designed ergonomic work environment is low operating costs is true or false