Jamie peters invested $100,000 to set up the following portfolio 1 year ago. a. calculate the percentage return of each asset in the portfolio for the year. b. calculate the percentage return of th eportfolio on the asis of origianl cost, using income and gains during the year. c. at the time jamie made his investments, investors were estimating that the market return for the coming year would be 10% the estimate of the risk free rate of return averaged 4% for the coming year. calculate an expected rate of return for each stock on the basis of its beta and the expectations of market and risk free returns. d. on the basis of the actual results, explain how each stock in the portfolio performed relative to those capm genearated expectations of performance. what factors could explain these differences? asset cost weight beta at purch multiplied weight by beta yearly income value todaya 2 0.2 0.8 0.16 1600 2b 35000 0.35 0.95 0.3325 1400 36000c 3 0.3 1.5 0.45 34500d 15000 0.15 1.25 0.1875 375 16500a. 1.13 portfolio beta

What is the difference between a government and a state

Monetary policy in the united states is carried out primarily by which of the following agencies? a. the department of the treasury b. the small business association c. the federal reserve bank d. the u. s. mint 2b2t

This problem has been solved! see the answercompute and interpret altman's z-scoresfollowing is selected financial information for ebay, for its fiscal years 2005 and 2006.(in millions, except per share data) 2006 2005current assets $ 4,970.59 $ 3,183.24current liabilities 2,518.39 1,484.93total assets 13,494.01 11,788.99total liabilities 2,589.38 1,741.00shares outstanding 1,368.51 1,404.18retained earnings 4,538.35 2,819.64stock price per share 30.07 43.22sales 5,969.74 4,552.40earnings before interest and taxes 1,439.77 1,445.18compute and interpret altman z-scores for the company for both years. (do not round until your final answer; then round your answers to two decimal places.)2006 z-score = answer2005 z-score = answerwhich of the following best describes the company's likelihood to go bankrupt given the z-score in 2006 compared to 2007.the z-score in 2006 is half of the 2005 score. both z-scores are well above the score that represents a healthy company. the z-score in 2006 is double the 2005 score. the z-score has increased sharply, which suggests the company has greatly increased the risk of bankruptcy. the z-score in 2006 is half of the 2005 score. the z-score has decreased sharply, which suggests the company is in financial distress. the z-score in 2006 is double the 2005 score. the z-score has increased sharply, which suggests the company has greatly lowered the risk of bankruptcy.