Business
Business, 10.11.2019 05:31, taseem001

Katie burns was recently hired as a cost analyst by wellcare medical supplies, inc. one of katie’s first assignments was to perform a net present value analysis for a new warehouse. katie performed the analysis and calculated a present value index of 0.75. the plant manager, samuel mchenry, is very intent on purchasing the warehouse because he believes that more storage space is needed. samuel asks katie into his office and the following conversation takes place: samuel: katie, you’re new here, aren’t you? katie: yes, sir. samuel: well, katie, i’m not at all with the capital investment analysis that you performed on this new warehouse. i need the warehouse for my production. if i don’t get it, where am i going to place our output? katie: hopefully with the customer, sir. samuel: now don’t get smart with me. katie: no, really, i wasn’t trying to be disrespectful. my analysis does not support constructing a new warehouse. the numbers don’t lie; the warehouse does not meet our investment return targets. in fact, it seems to me that purchasing a warehouse does not add much value to the business. we need to be producing product to satisfy customer orders, not to fill a warehouse. samuel: listen, you need to understand something. j the headquarters people will not allow me to build the warehouse if the numbers don’t add up. you know as well as i that many assumptions go into your net present value analysis. why don’t you relax some of your assumptions so that the financial savings will offset the cost? katie: i’m willing to discuss my assumptions with you. maybe i overlooked something. samuel: here’s what i want you to do. i see in your analysis that you don’t project greater sales as a result of the warehouse. it seems to me, if we can store more goods, then we will have more to sell. thus, logically, a larger warehouse translates into more sales. if you incorporate this into your analysis, i think you’ll see that the numbers will work out. why don’t you work it through and come back with a new analysis. i’m really counting on you on this one. let’s get off to a good start together and see if we can get this project accepted. required: what is your advice to katie? is samuel correct in his assumptions? be specific in your discussion

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 22.06.2019 08:50, terrancebest
Comprehensive illustrative problem: mira's store on february 1 20a4 mica delaman opened astore that sells school supplies her main customer are the students and teachers of happy students school that is situated in front of her store. mira wanted to know the financial position of mira's store. mira knew you were studying accounting. so she asked for . 1. to start her business mira's opened a checking account in the name of mira's store . the statement of account from the bank shows that the checking account has a balance of 31,535 of december 31,20a4
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 13:30, Mariaisagon9050
Jose recently died with a probate estate of $900,000. he was predeceased by his wife, guadalupe, and his daughter, lucy. he has two surviving children, pete and fred. jose was also survived by eight grandchildren, pete’s three children, naomi, daniel, nick; fred’s three children, heather, chris and steve; and lucy’s two children, david and rachel. jose’s will states the following “i leave everything to my three children. if any of my children shall predecease me then i leave their share to their heirs, per stirpes.” which of the following statements is correct? (a) under jose’s will rachel will receive $150,000. (b) under jose’s will chris will receive $150,000. (c) under jose’s will nick will receive $100,000. (d) under jose’s will pete will receive $200,000.
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 17:00, adrianbanuelos1999
Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court. the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court. because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located. because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center. because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.
Answers: 1
image
Business, 23.06.2019 02:00, sunflowerdaisy35
Which of the statements is true about the values recorded in the balance sheet of a firm?
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Katie burns was recently hired as a cost analyst by wellcare medical supplies, inc. one of katie’s f...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Biology, 27.04.2021 09:50