Business
Business, 09.11.2019 02:31, Fatimaneedhelp

Keen beans, a leading coffee roaster, anticipated that the prices of coffee beans from costa rica, where its main suppliers were located, would double in less than three years. this would significantly affect keen beans' profit margins. thus, keen beans decided to develop a new partnership with a supplier in indonesia. as predicted, the price of costa rican coffee beans increased twofold. because the price of indonesian coffee beans was much lower, keen beans was able to maintain its profit margins in turbulent times. which of the following isolating mechanisms does this scenario best illustrate? a) intellectual property protectionb) causal ambiguityc) time compression diseconomiesd) better expectations of future resource value

answer
Answers: 1

Similar questions

Предмет
Law, 11.11.2019 22:31, mathiscool51
owens inc. was a business that sought revenue by buying coffee beans from producers in latin american countries, and then packaging and distributing the beans in the u.s. to maximize profits, owens inc. bought both the highly reputed arabica beans and the cheaper robusta beans. owens inc. would often mix the robusta with the arabica beans, but advertise the coffee beans as pure arabica beans. this would allow owens inc. to benefit from the higher market prices of the rarer arabica coffee. starbucks entered into a ten-year contract with owens inc. to buy their marketed arabica beans. however, on further inspection, starbucks discovered that owens inc. had been misrepresenting the quality of their coffee beans. consequently, starbucks sought to terminate their contract with owens inc. a u.s. district court heard their case, and the court found that their contract lacked legal assent, and that owens inc. was required to pay for damages, including the money starbucks had spent on owens’s coffee beans. but what if the facts of the case were different? select each set of facts below that could change the power of that court to hear the case. you can choose more than one. a.) instead of owens’ diluting the quality of arabica coffee beans, the producers that supplied owens with coffee beans had laced the arabica beans with robusta, but marketed them to owens as pure arabica. owens had no knowledge that this had occurred, and starbucks still discovered that the arabica beans were impure. b.) starbucks had been informed by owens that owens had laced its marketed arabica coffee beans with robusta beans. c.) owens intended to deceive starbucks as well as other companies with whom it conducted business. d.) rather than owens’ lacing the arabica coffee beans with robusta beans, the producers that supplied owens with coffee beans had mixed their arabica beans with robusta beans, and marketed them to owen as pure arabica. however, the court found that owens could have discovered that this was occurring by using reasonable care.
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Keen beans, a leading coffee roaster, anticipated that the prices of coffee beans from costa rica, w...

Questions in other subjects: