Cars driven by sue trent and jim higgins were involved in an automobile accident where mr. higgins was at fault. sue trent's car was a total loss and valued at $6,000, plus she sustained bodily injuries totaling $25,000. scott finley, ms. trent's passenger, was injured and incurred $6,000 in medical expenses. mr. higgins, the responsible party, carries bodily injury coverage with limits of $15,000 per person and $30,000 per accident, and property damage coverage of $5,000. his policy will pay a maximum of:

Read the following scenario and answer the question in 5-10 sentences. you are the owner of a small business that is a defendant in a lawsuit in federal court. you received bad news from your lawyer that the judge did not allow certain documents to be admitted as evidence in court and that the jury reached a $50,000 verdict in favor of the plaintiff. your lawyer tells you that it is within your legal right to hire him to file an appeal with the united states court of appeals. if the appellate court rules in your favor, you may be able to avoid paying part or all of the $50,000. evaluate your lawyer’s suggestion about appealing the decision.

Which term best fits the sentence? is the process of reasoning, analyzing, and making important decisions. it’s an important skill in making career decisions. a. critical thinking b. weighing pros and cons c. goal setting

You are purchasing a bond that currently sold for $985.63. it has the time-to-maturity of 10 years and a coupon rate of 6%, paid semi-annually. the bond can be called for $1,020 in 3 years. what is the yield to maturity of this bond?