Business
Business, 30.10.2019 04:31, srutkowske1489

In a civil case, a plaintiff wins a lawsuit if he is 51 percent convincing, and collects 100 percent of his damages. in a criminal case the prosecutor must prove his case beyond a reasonable doubt. why is there such a significant difference in the burden of proof between civil and criminal cases? a. the burden is higher in a criminal case because the consequences that the defendant faces are more severe. b. the burden is lower in a civil case because society wants to encourage litigation; it is the best way to resolve disputes. c. the burden is higher in a criminal case because we want to make sure that we find more defendants guilty even if it risks putting innocent people behind bars. d. the burden is lower in a civil case because the plaintiff has to pay both his own and the defendant’s legal fees. during discovery, lawyers for the defense find out that the plaintiff was hospitalized in a psychiatric facility last april. if the court grants the defense access to the plaintiff’s full medical records from that hospitalization, it is most likely because:

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 22.06.2019 05:00, swelch2010
You are chairman of the board of a successful technology firm. there is a nominal federal corporate tax rate of 35 percent, yet the effective tax rate of the typical corporation is about 12.6%. your firm has been clever with use of transfer pricing and keeping money abroad and has barely paid any taxes over the last 5 years; during this same time period, profits were $28 billion. one member of the board feels that it is un-american to use various accounting strategies in order to avoid paying taxes. others feel that these are legal loopholes and corporations have a fiduciary responsibility to minimize taxes. one board member quoted what the ceo of exxon once said: “i’m not a u. s. company and i don’t make decisions based on what’s good for the u. s.” what are the alternatives? what are your recommendations? why do you recommend this course of action?
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 06:30, hannahroswall1
Ummit record company is negotiating with two banks for a $157,000 loan. fidelity bank requires a compensating balance of 24 percent, discounts the loan, and wants to be paid back in four quarterly payments. southwest bank requires a compensating balance of 12 percent, does not discount the loan, but wants to be paid back in 12 monthly installments. the stated rate for both banks is 9 percent. compensating balances will be subtracted from the $157,000 in determining the available funds in part a. a-1. calculate the effective interest rate for fidelity bank and southwest bank. (do not round intermediate calculations. input your answers as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places.) a-2. which loan should summit accept? southwest bank fidelity bank b. recompute the effective cost of interest, assuming that summit ordinarily maintains $37,680 at each bank in deposits that will serve as compensating balances
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 11:30, dcox5057
Chuck, a single taxpayer, earns $80,750 in taxable income and $30,750 in interest from an investment in city of heflin bonds. (use the u. s. tax rate schedule.) (do not round intermediate calculations. round your answers to 2 decimal places.)
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 16:00, angelinaranee15
In a perfectly competitive market, the long-run market supply curve tends to be horizontal or nearly so. what is another way to state this fact? (a) market supply is much more elastic in the long run than the short run. (b) in the long run, average total cost is minimized. (c) in the long run, price equals marginal cost. (d) market supply is much less elastic in the long run than the short run.
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
In a civil case, a plaintiff wins a lawsuit if he is 51 percent convincing, and collects 100 percent...

Questions in other subjects: