Suppose that in 2002 the market for rented apartments in manhattan has the following supply and demand curves: q 4000 -p qs1000+4p where p is the monthly rent. what is the equilibrium price (rent) for an apartment? how many apartments are built and rented out? now suppose the government imposes rent control, ruling that rents may not rise above $500. what is the excess demand (shortage) of apartments? what is the total deadweight loss (in dollars)? in 2003 the population of manhattan rises by 100, which increases the quantity demanded at any price by 100. what is the new demand curve? in the absence of rent control, what would the equilibrium price and quantity be? what would be the increase from 2002 to 2003 in the quantity of housing supplied? suppose the rent control of the previous year is still in place. what is the increase in the quantity of housing supplied? what is the excess demand (shortage) of apartments? what is the deadweight loss? based on your answers to 2 and 6, how might rent controls explain why it is getting harder and harder to find an apartment in manhattan? suppose no rent control existed, and the equilibrium rent (price) prevailed. what would be the percentage growth in rental rates from 2002 to 2003? suppose rents continued to grow at this rate. how many years would it take for the rental rate to double? 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.

Alocal barnes and noble bookstore ordered 80 marketing books but received 60 books. what percent of the order was missing?

Calculate riverside’s financial ratios for 2014. assume that riverside had $1,000,000 in lease payments and $1,400,000 in debt principal repayments in 2014. (hint: use the book discussion to identify the applicable ratios.)

This problem has been solved! see the answercompute and interpret altman's z-scoresfollowing is selected financial information for ebay, for its fiscal years 2005 and 2006.(in millions, except per share data) 2006 2005current assets $ 4,970.59 $ 3,183.24current liabilities 2,518.39 1,484.93total assets 13,494.01 11,788.99total liabilities 2,589.38 1,741.00shares outstanding 1,368.51 1,404.18retained earnings 4,538.35 2,819.64stock price per share 30.07 43.22sales 5,969.74 4,552.40earnings before interest and taxes 1,439.77 1,445.18compute and interpret altman z-scores for the company for both years. (do not round until your final answer; then round your answers to two decimal places.)2006 z-score = answer2005 z-score = answerwhich of the following best describes the company's likelihood to go bankrupt given the z-score in 2006 compared to 2007.the z-score in 2006 is half of the 2005 score. both z-scores are well above the score that represents a healthy company. the z-score in 2006 is double the 2005 score. the z-score has increased sharply, which suggests the company has greatly increased the risk of bankruptcy. the z-score in 2006 is half of the 2005 score. the z-score has decreased sharply, which suggests the company is in financial distress. the z-score in 2006 is double the 2005 score. the z-score has increased sharply, which suggests the company has greatly lowered the risk of bankruptcy.