The may 2018 revenue and cost information for seattle outfitters, inc. follows: (click the icon to view the revenue and cost information.) prepare a standard cost income statement for management through gross profit. report all standard cost variances for management's use. has management done a good or poor job of controlling costs? explain. (use a minus sigr or parentheses to enter any contra expenses. enter all other amounts as positive numbers) data table seattle outfitters, inc standard cost income statement for the month ended may 31, 2018 sales revenue (at standard) cost of goods sold (at standard) direct materials cost variance direct materials efficiency variance direct labor cost variance direct labor efficiency variance variable overhead cost variance variable overhead efficiency variance fixed overhead cost variance fixed overhead volume variance $ 580,000 340,000 1.200 f 6,400 f 4.500 u 2,400 f 3,100 u 750 u 1,000 u 8,400 f print

in 2001, dell computer became the world’s largest personal computer vendor, continuing to

gain market share and post profits in an industry struggling with slumping sales and billions of

dollars in losses. dell sells 90% of its pcs directly to the final customer, largely bypassing the

reseller channel that accounts for most of the world’s pc sales. this direct customer relationship

is the key to dell’s business model, and provides distinct advantages over the indirect sales

model. dell’s direct relationship with the customer allows it to tailor its offerings to customer

needs, offer add-on products and services, and use the internet to offer a variety of customer

services. in addition, dell’s pcs are built to customers’ specifications upon receipt of an order,

giving dell additional advantages over indirect pc vendors who must try to forecast demand and

ship products based on those forecasts. dell’s direct sales and build-to-order model has achieved

superior performance in the pc industry in terms of inventory turnover, reduced overhead, cash

conversion, and return on investment (kraemer, et al., 2000).

explanation:

i believe it’s b because the rest don’t make sense

the correct answer is - no.

winnipeg, canada, is not further away from the equator than moscow, russia, in fact moscow is the city that is further away from the equator. moscow is on a latitude of 55.7558° north, while winnipeg is on a latitude of 49.8951° north, thus putting moscow by 5.8607° further away from the equator than winnipeg is.