Joe takes his car into the repair shop to have his tires realigned. while he is waiting for his car, he sees the repairmen take his car to the area where they change the car's oil. joe tries to get their attention but cannot because he is not allowed in the repair area and there is too much noise in there for the repairmen to hear him knocking on the window. the car is then taken to the area where the tires are realigned. joe watches while the tires are realigned. the employees next take joe's car to be washed. joe asks another customer in the waiting room if the car wash is complimentary (free). the customer points to the sign above the counter listing prices for services, including the car wash. joe does not bother trying to get the attention of the repairmen because he was not successful before, but he does approach the cashier who has just returned from break. joe tells the cashier he did not want the car washed. the cashier tells him it is too late because the car is already being washed. when joe is presented with the bill, there is a charge for the oil change, the realignment, and the car wash. if challenged in court, the court will most likely require joe to pay for: a. the entire bill (oil change, realignment, and the car wash) under the doctrine of quasi contract because joe saw all of the work being done and was unable to stop it. b. the entire bill (oil change, realignment, and the car wash) because he had a contract with the repair shop for all three items. c. only the realignment because that is all he contracted for. d. the realignment because that is what he contracted for and the car wash under the doctrine of quasi contract because he spent too much time talking to the customer before he told the cashier he didn't want the car washed.