Suppose that jack and hal and sophia enter into an agreement to sell the restaurant. the contract includes the non-competition agreement. a few months later, jack decides that he will sell the frozen food in violation of non-competition agreement unless if hal and sophia agree to pay him an extra $100,000. hal and sophia agree since they do not want to fight. six months later, however the still have not paid and jack sues. what is the result?
a. hal and sophia would win since agreeing to not do something, in this case sell the food, is not valid consideration. b. hal and sophia would win, since jack already had a prior existing legal duty to not compete with them. c. jack would win since agreeing to not do something, in this case sell the food, is not valid consideration. d. jack would win since hal and sophia agreed to pay the extra $100,000.

D Your welcome.

bd = 9 cm

step-by-step explanation:

in a 30°-60°-90° triangle, the ratio of side lengths is 1 : √3 : 2. that is, the longest side (hypotenuse) is twice the length of the shortest side.

all of the triangles in your geometry are 30°-60°-90° triangles. ac is the hypotenuse of δacd, and the short side of δabc.

the short side ad of δacd will be half the length of ac, so 3 cm. the hypotenuse ab of δabc will be twice the length of ac, so 12 cm. segment bd is the difference of the lengths ab and ad, so is

bd = ab -ad

bd = 12 cm - 3 cm = 9 cm

comment on side length ratios

you can figure the ratios of side lengths in a 30°-60°-90° triangle by considering the trig ratios of the angles. or you can figure the length of the altitude of an equilateral triangle of side length 2 using the pythagorean theorem.

all of them make sense but, i would have to say ask someone who has been there/or lives there, and/or read recent newspapers from that city.

hope this !