In soldano v. o'daniels, the court re-examined the common-law rule of nonliability for not taking affirmative action to save someone from peril. the court considered which of the following factors with respect to imposing duties for affirmative action by third parties? a) the examination and balancing of intervening causes and physical capabilities. b) the financial duties of victim to rescuer. c) moral blame attached to the defendant's conduct and the policy of preventing future harm. d) moral blame attached to the victim's conduct.