Business
Business, 23.09.2019 22:10, davidpausiankhowv3nf

Nita, a cash basis taxpayer, sued her former employer for wage discrimination. her attorney agreed to pursue the case on a contingent fee basis- the attorney would receive one-third of any settlement or court award. the parties reached a settlement, and the attorney for anita's former employer wrote a check payable to anita for $320,000 and a check payable to her attorney for $160,000. anita reasons that she and the attorney were partners in the lawsuit who shared profits two-thirds and one-third, respectively. therefore, she includes $320,000 in her gross income. is anita's analysis correct? explain.

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 22.06.2019 02:30, bri9263
The amberssen specialty company is a chain of twelve retail stores that sell a variety of imported gift items, gourmet chocolates, cheeses, and wines in the toronto area. amberssen has an is staff of three people who have created a simple but effective information system of networked point-of-sale registers at the stores and a centralized accounting system at the company head- quarters. harry hilman, the head of amberssens is group, has just received the following memo from bill amberssen, sales director (and son of amberssen’s founder). harry—it’s time amberssen specialty launched itself on the internet. many of our competitors are already there, selling to customers without the expense of a retail storefront, and we should be there too. i project that we could double or triple our annual revenues by selling our products on the internet. i’d like to have this ready by - giving, in time for the prime holiday gift-shopping season. bill after pondering this memo for several days, harry scheduled a meeting with bill so that he could clarify bill’s vision of this venture. using the standard con- tent of a system request as your guide, prepare a list of questions that harry needs to have answered about this project.
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 07:20, staxeeyy767
Richardson hired j. c. flood company, a plumbing contractor, to correct a stoppage in the sewer line of her house. the plumbing company's 'snake' device, used to clear the line leading to the main sewer, became caught in the underground line. to release it, the company excavated a portion of the sewer line in richardson's backyard. in the process, the company discovered numerous leaks in a rusty, defective water pipe that ran parallel with the sewer line. to meet public regulations, the water pipe, of a type no longer approved for such service, had to be replaced either then or later, when the yard would have to be excavated again. the plumbing company proceeded to repair the water pipe. though richardson inspected the company's work daily and did not express any objection to the extra work involved in replacing the water pipe, she refused to pay any part of the total bill after the company completed the entire operation. j. c. flood company then sued richardson for the costs of labor and material it had furnished. (c) for what, if anything, should richardson be liable? explain."
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 11:00, samwamooo
Specialization—the division of labor—enhances productivity and efficiency by a) allowing workers to take advantage of existing differences in their abilities and skills. b) avoiding the time loss involved in shifting from one production task to another. c) allowing workers to develop skills by working on one, or a limited number, of tasks. d)all of the means identified in the other answers.
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 23:00, tonya3498
Which of the following is not one of the four principles of bottleneck management? a. increasing capacity at non-bottleneck stations is a mirageb. lost time at the bottleneck is lost system capacity. c. release work orders to the system at the bottleneck's capacity pace. d. increased bottleneck capacity is increased system capacity. e. bottlenecks should be moved to the end of the system process.
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Nita, a cash basis taxpayer, sued her former employer for wage discrimination. her attorney agreed t...

Questions in other subjects: