Business
Business, 17.08.2019 23:20, breannabryan1017

In 2015, the european commission charged six u. s. studios and a u. k. pay television company, sky uk, with unfairly blocking access to films and other content. the charges challenge the studios' requirement under contracts that sky uk block access for consumers outside britain and ireland. (kanter, james, and mark scott, "e. u. opens antitrust case against major u. s. studios and sky uk," new york times, july 23, 2015.) the studios have separate contracts with broadcasters in other countries. why do the studios want such restrictions? the studios seek restrictions blocking access to films and other content across country lines in order to a. segment markets. b. limit market power. c. changes preferences. d. allow resale. e. promote arbitrage.

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 22.06.2019 11:10, AM28
Your team has identified the risks on the project and determined their risk score. the team is in the midst of determining what strategies to put in place should the risks occur. after some discussion, the team members have determined that the risk of losing their network administrator is a risk they'll just deal with if and when it occurs. although they think it's a possibility and the impact would be significant, they've decided to simply deal with it after the fact. which of the following is true regarding this question? a. this is a positive response strategy. b. this is a negative response strategy. c. this is a response strategy for either positive or negative risk known as contingency planning. d. this is a response strategy for either positive or negative risks known as passive acceptance.
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 11:30, dcox5057
Chuck, a single taxpayer, earns $80,750 in taxable income and $30,750 in interest from an investment in city of heflin bonds. (use the u. s. tax rate schedule.) (do not round intermediate calculations. round your answers to 2 decimal places.)
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 19:20, jamiewest5666
1. revising for conciseness - eliminating flabby expressions, limiting long lead-ins, and dropping unnecessary fillerstime is money in any business environment. people want information communicated quickly and clearly. to make your writing more concise and understandable, avoid flabby expressions, long lead-ins, and unnecessary fillers. your audience will appreciate your brevity.1. if your writing contains a flabby expression like in view of the fact that, replace it with the word because / although / probably .for each of the following two sentences, choose the best revision.2. i am sending you this letter to inform you that we have experienced an unexpected surprise within our expense sheet, but we are positively certain we will solve it.1) we need to inform you that we have experienced an unexpected surprise with our expense sheet, but we are midway to an end result.2) we have identified a problem with our expense sheet, but we will solve it.3) i am sending you this letter to inform you that we have a problem with our expense sheet, but we are positively certain we have a solution.3. it is the user who should contact the center.1) everyone knows that it is the user who should contact the center.2) the user should contact the center.3) if there is a problem, the user should contact the center. read the following passage, and then answer the question.[1] you scheduled seven conference calls for this morning between 10 and 11 a. m. [2] generally, the company limits the number of conference calls to three per hour. [3] i’m letting you know that in the future, we should be more careful about scheduling.4. which revision limits the long lead-in in sentence 3? 1) in the future, we should be more careful about scheduling.2) i’m letting you know so that in the future we are more careful about scheduling calls.3) so that you know in the future, we should be more careful about scheduling.
Answers: 3
image
Business, 23.06.2019 00:00, areanna02
An attorney came to work on a saturday. when he signed in, he was advised by the morning security guard employed by the building management that he must be out of the building by 5 p. m., when it closes. however, he stayed past 5 p. m. to complete a brief that had to be filed on monday morning. at 5: 15 p. m., the afternoon security guard set the locks on all the doors of the building and left. because she was in a hurry, she did not check the sign-in sheet to make sure that everyone had signed out, contrary to mandatory procedures. when the attorney tried to exit 15 minutes later, he discovered that the doors were all locked and could not be opened from the inside. he used his cell phone to call for , and a supervisor from the building arrived and let him out shortly thereafter. if the attorney sues the building management for false imprisonment, is he likely to win?
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
In 2015, the european commission charged six u. s. studios and a u. k. pay television company, sky u...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Health, 11.01.2021 14:00