Five proposals (v, w, x, y, and z) are available for investment. at least two and no more than four must be chosen. proposals x and y are mutually exclusive. proposal z is contingent on either proposal x or y being funded. proposal v cannot be pursued if either w, x, y, or any combination of the three are pursued. which of these investment alternatives is feasible?

There are four alternatives

X- Z- W

X-W

Y-Z-W

Y-W

Explanation:

if X is founded, we cannot found Y or V so:

1)X- Z- W

2)X-W

if Y is founded, we cannot found X or V so:

3)Y-Z-W

4)Y-W

Z cannot be founded without X or Y

His alternatives are included in X and Y

if V is founded we cannot found W XY and Z can't be elegible without X or Y

There is no combination with V

W will be pick with X or Y and we have those cover, so we don't have a new alternative.