Business
Business, 05.07.2019 21:30, joel3410

Background: the gc owners are aware of the importance of contracts to both buy and sell goods and services. they are reviewing the uniform commercial code (ucc), article 2, that covers contracts for sales of goods. the gc owners understand that the terms in their purchase contracts (i. e., contracts to purchase products from epi) will require very different terms from their sales contracts reselling these cleaning products purchased from epi. first, the owners want to focus on understanding their rights and obligations associated with reselling epi cleaning products. winnie and ralph ask you to prepare information to the gc understand risks and possible liabilities related to the resale of epi cleaning goods to customers. you develop a hypothetical scenario for analysis and explanation for discussion with the gc owners. hypothetical scenario: office cleaning pros (pros), a local company, emailed gc that it wanted to purchase some cleaning products. the email stated the following sales details: pros wanted to purchase 6 cases of carpet re-new cleaning solution from gcthe price is $200 per case of carpet re-newdelivery was to be on or before april 1, 2019delivery was to be made to pros storage warehouse facilitygc did not respond to the email, but on april 1, gc delivered 6 cases of cleaning solution products to pros office headquarters, located next door to pros’ storage warehouse facility. pros accepted the delivery at its headquarters. three days later, pros inspected the 6 cases gc had delivered and discovered all 6 cases contained floor re-new cleaning solution, not carpet re-new as specified in the sales contract. instructions: prepare a memorandum to winnie and ralph to use for discussion with the gc owners. referring to the scenario above: 1. analyze and explain whether there is a valid sales contract between gc and pros under the ucc.2. discuss the rights and obligations of pros following the inspection. a. list 2-3 ucc rules relevant to these rights and obligations.3. discuss the rights and obligations of gc under the circumstances following delivery and pros’ inspection of the goods. a. list 2-3 ucc rules relevant to these rights and obligations. format for memorandum: memorandumto: winnie james, ralph andersfrom: your namere: gc sales contractsdate: 1.2.a.3. in correct, complete sentences in paragraph format.

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 21.06.2019 23:30, KylaChanel4756
You are frustrated to find that the only way to contact the customer service department is to make a phone call. the number listed would result in long distance charges to your phone bill. which issue should be addressed by the company to keep its crm in line with your expectations?
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 11:00, ayoismeisjjjjuan
Acoase solution to a problem of externality ensures that a socially efficient outcome is to
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 19:30, hmae2304
Alaska king crab fishing in the 1960s and '70s was a dangerous but rich fishery. boats from as far away as california and japan braved the treacherous gulf of alaska crossing to reach the abundant king crab beds in cook inlet and bristol bay. suddenly, in the early 1980s, the fishery crashed due to over fishing. all crabbing in those areas ended. to this day, there is no crabbing in bristol bay or cook inlet. a. how would an economist explain the decline of the alaska king crab fishery
Answers: 3
image
Business, 23.06.2019 15:00, Osorio5116
How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Background: the gc owners are aware of the importance of contracts to both buy and sell goods and s...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 17.11.2020 20:00
Konu
Spanish, 17.11.2020 20:00