The process through which professional scientists evaluate the quality of each others’ research is called group counsel. group review. peer counsel. peer review.

The answer is peer review. Scientists are pressured to publish their studies. They do this by submitting a document containing their study results to a journal. Each journal has one or more editors. The editor will seek out about three scientists working in the same field who are not affiliated with the study and ask them to evaluate the document to see whether it is worthy of publication. These scientists officially act as 'reviewers'. The reviewers will assess whether the study is 'novel' enough, i.e., whether it is a new idea, and whether the science is free of errors. Depending on the outcomes or the review, the paper might be published, the original authors may be asked to correct the manuscript or the manuscript might be rejected. 

The answer is peer review. Scientists are pressured to publish their studies. They do this by submitting a document containing their study results to a journal. Each journal has one or more editors. The editor will seek out about three scientists working in the same field who are not affiliated with the study and ask them to evaluate the document to see whether it is worthy of publication. These scientists officially act as 'reviewers'. The reviewers will assess whether the study is 'novel' enough, i.e., whether it is a new idea, and whether the science is free of errors. Depending on the outcomes or the review, the paper might be published, the original authors may be asked to correct the manuscript or the manuscript might be rejected.